Things are starting to build here in Pasadena. Great hosting the BCS Championship along with the Rose Parade and Rose Bowl Game.
Have a safe, happy and prosperous New Year!
Paul
Things are starting to build here in Pasadena. Great hosting the BCS Championship along with the Rose Parade and Rose Bowl Game.
Have a safe, happy and prosperous New Year!
Paul
Categories: Uncategorized
I never heard of Zhu Zhu Pets before I read this story in the LA Times:
|
|
Categories: Uncategorized
We hosted our annual Holiday Party and gave away toys to Child Care Information Service and Hathaway-Sycamores. Santa even showed up to spread some cheer.
We were invited to the Langham Huntington Hotel for the viewing party for the finals of this year’s Top Chef. Langham Chef de Cuisine Michael Voltaggio was a finalist. Now he’s Top Chef! Congratulations Michael and The Langham! Great evening for the hotel and for Pasadena.
Categories: Uncategorized
The Chamber is hosting a raffle for two BCS game tickets and two official tailgate party passes. Want to see Texas and Alabama square off for the big game on January 7th? Enter that Chamber raffle at www.pasadena-chamber.org/pdfs/BCS-Raffle.pdf. You can fax your entry to (626) 795-5603. Hurry, entry deadline is Friday, December 19th.
Only 100 raffle tickets will be sold for $100 each. The Texas Longhorns vs. Alabama Crimson Tide tickets are selling online for $2500 each.
Good luck!
Categories: Uncategorized
Gold Class Cinema, a luxury movie experience, just opened in Old Pasadena. They hosted the Chamber for a VIP reception and screening in their new facility in Old Pasadena. Guests were treated to drinks and hors d’oeuvres before the movie, then ushered into the most comfortable viewing experience where we saw a movie and were served sample meals and drinks during the screening.
The LA Times was intrigued:

The scene inside one of the theaters during a screening at Gold Class Cinemas in Pasadena. (Lawrence K. Ho / Los Angeles Times / December 8, 2009)
As they relaxed in the dimly lighted lounge, awaiting the sold-out screening of “Invictus,” Stephen Galloway and his wife, Tina, were perusing the menu between sips of champagne. A waiter had just brought a chilled $49 bottle of Schramsberg sparkling wine and was ready for their order.
Tina was contemplating the $14 plate of fried calamari with ginger and lemon, while Stephen had a hankering for the $19 New York strip steak sandwich.
The Galloways are hardly high rollers — he’s a property manager and she’s a social worker. Still, the Pasadena couple were more than willing to fork over $29 each for a movie ticket, on top of the bill for champagne and finger food.
It is a truly unique movie-going experience. Luxury, service, comfort, good food and drink.
Welcome to Pasadena Gold Class Cinema.
Paul
Categories: Pasadena Chamber Events · Pasadena Chamber of Commerce · Shop Pasadena · Uncategorized
Tagged: Chamber Events, Chamber of Commerce, Gold Class, Old Pasadena, Pasadena Chamber, VIP
The Pasadena Chamber of Commerce hosted the annual tribute to the Tournament of Roses at the Westin Pasadena. Breakfast was attended by city leadership, Tournament past presidents and rising leadership and many community leaders. Mayor Bill Bogaard and Assemblymember Anthony Portantino joined us along with Chamber Board members. The honored guests are always the past presidents, who come in their signature red jackets and the Royal Court who enchant the entire room.
Board Chair Ray Serafin mentioned some of the significant economic impacts the Tournament has on our area as well as the tremendously positive contribution the Rose Parade and Rose Bowl Game have had on Pasadena.
Retiring Tournament CEO Mitch Dorger was also recognized for his ten year contribution leading the staff of the Tournament.
A great event recognizing perhaps the single most important influence on the quality of life and vitality of the Pasadena area. Special thanks for Chamber staff and our Ambassadors for making the beakfast a huge success.
Categories: Uncategorized
Some good news on unemployment, from the LA Times:
By Don Lee and Peter Nicholas, reporting from washington and Tiffany Hsu
Reporting from Washington Tiffany Hsu and Los Angeles — After two long years of economic destruction that saw about 8 million American jobs disappear, the national payroll essentially stopped shrinking last month in an unexpected turn that raised hopes a labor market recovery might finally be at hand.
Although most analysts had expected November’s job losses to top 100,000, the Labor Department said Friday that employers shed just 11,000 jobs in November — the smallest number lost since the recession began in December 2007.
And the nation’s unemployment rate fell to 10% last month, down from 10.2% in October.
The Obama administration is cautioning against reading too much into one month’s figures. Good advice. Though we can all be optimistic.
There may be another mortgage crisis coming as homeowners with restructured loans continue to have trouble making payments.
By Renae Merle
Reporting from Washington - About 25% of borrowers helped under the administration’s massive foreclosure prevention plan have already fallen behind on their new mortgage payments, according to government data that raise new questions about the program’s effectiveness.
The delinquency figures reflect the latest troubles of the program, known as Making Home Affordable. Treasury Department officials this week announced a campaign to put new pressure on lenders to do more to move struggling homeowners into loans with easier terms.
So far, more than 650,000 borrowers have been enrolled into the initial or trial phase of the program and have seen their payments lowered by an average of $640 a month, or 40%. But a recent survey of large mortgage servicers published by the Treasury Department found that more than 25% of borrowers in the program were not current on their trial payments.
But banks that received TARP funds are paying the money back. From the New York Times:
By Jim Puzzanghera and Walter Hamilton
Reporting from Washington and New York - The government’s bailout of the banking system is turning out to be far from the fiscal sinkhole so many had feared.
The $700-billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, known as TARP, was reluctantly created by Congress last fall despite criticism that it was a huge risk that would only encourage the profligate ways of Wall Street. But in recent months, tens of billions of dollars have begun flowing back from banks to the U.S. Treasury.
Bank of America Corp.’s decision this week to repay one of the largest chunks — $45 billion — reflects the stunning turnaround of the financial industry and demonstrates that the government’s unpopular medicine appears to have saved the patient. And the price tag isn’t as large as expected.
More good news. And some scary news, too:
Consumers continued to send mixed signals in November as they teetered between optimism about signs of economic recovery and fears about the job market and home values.
That ambivalence was reflected in reports from retailers on November sales, which were a slight improvement over last year, yet well below the highs of two to three years ago.
Over all, the industry posted a 0.5 percent increase on Thursday in sales for November in comparison to a year ago, when sales declined 7.8 percent, according toThomson Reuters. The International Council of Shopping Centers, a trade group, calculated the November figure to be lower, saying sales declined 0.3 percent.
Of course, some of it may simply be due to the odd way the Thanksgiving weekend falls this year, and holiday fatigue already.
Categories: Uncategorized
A story in today’s Pasadena Star-News illustrates why EVERYONE needs to be involved in the revision of Pasadena’s General Plan.
The story purports to explain that Pasadena’s citizenry are “fed up” with dense development. More accurate would be to say that a few citizens interviewed for the story, certainly not a representative group, want less development in downtown Pasadena.
I would be interested to hear Terry Tornek’s response to the notion that more and denser development could be targeted toward the Caltech and PCC neighborhoods. (I expect Juliana Delgado was speaking of residential development.)
I have been involved in many of those community meetings, and density does come up as an issue, but frequently the concerns end up focusing on design and how close buildings are to the sidewalks. People don’t appreciate cheap-looking buildings that meet the sidewalk directly without any landscaping or modulation to make them more friendly and appealing.
What is being left off the discussions at this point is the economic impacts of development. Not mentioned is the fact that the residential development at Del Mar and Pasadena Avenue is paying a substantial portion of the purchase price of the Annandale Canyon Estates property that will now be open space. Or the (estimated by the Urban Land Institute) $9 per day each office employee in Pasadena spends near their place of employment.
Also absent are state mandates regarding greenhouse gas reductions and climate change which call for denser development of housing near employment centers.
It is also worth noting that the people quoted in the article did not attend any of the meetings with business groups and only sporadically attended community and council district meetings. A lot of information that has been gathered has yet to be compiled. Once that work is complete, there should be a more comprehensive picture of what the entire Pasadena community (or communities) are concerned about.
Here’s the article in its entirety, since the Star-News archives fairly quickly.
Editor’s note: This is the first of a series of periodic stories on Pasadena’s General Plan update.
PASADENA – In the midst of a city planning process that will determine what Pasadena’s future growth will look like, one thing certain has emerged: Residents are decidedly against high-density construction.
For the past 15 years, since the 1994 General Plan update, the city’s development policies have focused on encouraging new growth in central Pasadena, along Colorado Boulevard, while keeping it away from neighborhoods.
But at recent community meetings on the General Plan update, some concerns have surfaced over density in Central Pasadena.
“It was a good idea to develop that area, but the way it has turned out has been overkill,” said Berlinda Brown, a member of the city’s General Plan Update Advisory Committee, which is overseeing the planning process.
Every five years, the city updates its General Plan, the master guide for Pasadena’s future decisions on housing and commercial development, transportation, open space, and other planning issues.
The public input part of the process is now over – officials held several community meetings across the city – and now the advisory committee is working on a new draft of the General Plan update, to be completed sometime this spring.
While some residents want tougher rules to check the city’s population growth by discouraging new housing development, state laws make such restrictions very difficult to implement, said Stephanie DeWolf, deputy director of planning and development.
The state requires cities to plan ahead for a certain amount of population growth per year. Each city receives a state-recommended number of new homes and apartments it must build in the future in order to accommodate that growth, DeWolf said.
The state does not currently enforce those requirements, but some state legislators have proposed bills that would allow the state to withhold funding from cities that don’t follow the guidelines, she said.
As a result, DeWolf added, Pasadena’s General Plan update likely will not be a document that mandates slow- growth policies.
“The question becomes not whether you have density in the city, but where,” said Emily Stork, an advisory committee member.
Where within the city future developments are built is one of the things committee members agreed could change in the new update.
“I think people want the density to be more evenly distributed, instead of focused in one place,” Brown said.
Committee member Julianna Delgado,who is a professor of urban design at Cal Poly Pomona, said new areas to be targeted for growth will likely be along sections well covered by public transportation, or in locations that encourage walking.
Neighborhoods around Caltech and Pasadena City College, would be prime examples, said Delgado.
East Pasadena has not seen substantial growth over the years, she added. Neighborhoods just south of the Foothill (210) Freeway with close access to the Gold Line also could be candidates for new developments, she said.
Meanwhile, residents in certain neighborhoods have expressed concerns about being unfairly targeted for more apartments and other housing. For example, advisory committee members from the Northwest say they believe the city has focused mostly on their neighborhoods as sites for new affordable housing projects.
“I do see more housing in that area in the future,” said committee member Dante Hall, who also is assistant city manager in El Monte. “But there should also be market-rate housing that can help bring economic development to the area.”
Residents also have been generally against high-density commercial developments. For example, a proposal to bring a new Home Depot to Lincoln Avenue and Washington Boulevard continues to be strongly opposed by nearby residents.
Whatever the General Plan committee ultimately decides, few believe its recommendations will amount to a significant departure from Pasadena’s current development policies.
“I can’t imagine the plan ending up being at all extreme in the changes that will be made,” said Delgado. “I think most people view it as just an update.”
(626) 962-8811 ext. 4451
Categories: News and Information · Opinion · Pasadena · Pasadena Chamber of Commerce · Pasadena Economy · Pasadena General Plan · Uncategorized
Tagged: business, business growth, development, economy, General Plan, growth, Pasadena business, Pasadena Chamber, taxes
Enjoy the day with family and friends. We have a lot to be thankful for.
We live in a great city. We are safe and secure.You can’t buy better weather. Even our economy, though stressed, remains relatively strong.
If you want to help improve our economy, please spend your Black Friday (and more) holiday dollars with shops, stores, services and restaurants here in Pasadena.
From high end jewelry and fashionable clothes, to appliances, to a plumber to unclog your drain in an emergency, Chamber members can provide for all your holiday needs. Go to www.pasadena-chamber.org/directory to find everything you need for the holidays.
Thank you all for your support of the Pasadena Chamber of Commerce.
Happy Thanksgiving.
Categories: Uncategorized
We have few opportunities to really impact the adequacy of our water supply. We can find more water from our existing sources, which seems less and less likely as both MWD and Pasadena grapple with our current drought conditions. New sources really are not viable. Even if we spend multiple millions to import reclaimed water from Glendale, it may not add enough water to significantly enhance our supply.
That leaves conservation.
From the LA Times:

Hal Hannula waters his stripped-down backyard in San Luis Obispo. The civil engineer and his family have reduced their water consumption through landscaping, use of efficient appliances and other steps. “You don’t want to waste that resource,” he said. (Lawrence K. Ho, Los Angeles Times / August 27, 2009)
By Bettina Boxall
November 24, 2009
Reporting from San Luis Obispo, Calif. - Katie Martin grew up with a set of water commandments. No lingering in the shower. Turn off the faucet when you brush your teeth. Don’t flood the yard.
Until she left for college this fall, the 19-year-old lived with her family in a typical California stucco house with a lawn. But when it comes to water, neither the Martins nor their town, San Luis Obispo, is typical.
Katie, her parents and little brother use roughly half the water on a per-person basis as the average single-family household in Los Angeles used last year.
“The community is just like that,” Martin said.
Perhaps most interesting is that, even with the population surge of the past twenty years, water use in the Los Angeles area has remained flat. Mostly, the Times says, as a result of giveaways of water saving gadgets and requirements that developments use less water.
Meanwhile, California continues to try to find a way to reduce greenhouse gasses, the latest scheme would put a price on pollutants and create a market for greenhouse gases.
By Margot Roosevelt
November 24, 2009 | 8:45 p.m.
California officials on Tuesday issued the nation’s first blueprint for a broad-based cap-and-trade plan, an innovative and controversial effort to use market forces to control global warming.
The ambitious program would cap most of the state’s greenhouse gases, including those from more than 600 power plants, refineries, cement plants and other big factories. It would allow companies to buy and sell emission allowances among themselves to reach an overall goal of cutting planet-warming pollutants 15% below today’s levels by 2020.
The state’s action comes as Congress wrestles with a cap-and-trade bill for planet-heating emissions: Legislation passed by the House is stalled in the Senate.
“California is first out of the box,” California Air Resources Board Chairman Mary Nichols said.
Regulators estimated that California’s program could cost industry as much as $8 billion a year by 2020 if carbon trades at its current price on the European market of $20 per ton. European nations have operated a cap-and-trade program for the last five years.
But industry groups warned that the state’s push to control greenhouse gases could cost more than twice as much, and burden consumers with more expensive electricity, gas, housing and consumer goods.
We do need to grapple with and ultimately control greenhouse gas emissions. Is putting a price on the ability to pollute going to help, or simply create a new market for trading in a commodity that exists only on paper?
This will cost everyone who uses electricity in Southern California more money. Let’s hope it is not just a wealth transfer from the southern part of our state to the north.
We also need to watch Congress to see what federal efforts to create a nationwide cap-and-trade program end up with. And we need to watch that federal rules, prices and methods are not piled on top of California’s program so that our residents and businesses so that here, in the state that has led the nation in environmental stewardship, is not penalized for that leadership. California should not accept more stringent rules and regulations that any other state or region in the nation.
Paul
Categories: Uncategorized